Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy S6 edge+ is an extremely older and way thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster).
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 90% more battery size.
Galaxy S6 edge+ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.