Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 78.8. Although the Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than vivo X60 Pro, it's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Vivo X60 Pro has a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution, a way larger sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.