Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 global score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is a lot thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy S6 edge+ features a brighter display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a worse video quality and a back camera with lot less mega-pixels, and they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.