Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
U.S. CellularSM-G920R4
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 has a general score of 87.3, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Galaxy S6 construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S6 features a more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each display inch.
The Galaxy S6 has a bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional graphics processing unit. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ's camera is very similar to the Galaxy S6 one, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 16 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light captures.
LG V35 ThinQ has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.