Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
U.S. CellularSM-G920R4
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 is a little bit better than the LG Velvet, getting a score of 87.3 against 87.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S6 is incredibly older than LG Velvet, it's body is extremely lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a bit better processor than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional GPU.
Samsung Galaxy S6 has a way better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440. LG Velvet features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and a camera with way more megapixels.
The LG Velvet features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 69% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.