Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-08-28 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 One has an overall score of 76.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The LG G7 One construction is newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better looking display than LG G7 One, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG G7 One counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G7 One also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 One counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG G7 One also has 4 more processing cores.
LG G7 One takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG G7 One also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has longer battery life than LG G7 One, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.