Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The LG Wing construction is newer, but heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. LG Wing features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display pixel density. The LG Wing counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The LG Wing has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy S7 Active one.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.