Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 90.8 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 12 MP camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.