Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a way newer device, and it is also noticeably thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera aperture for better low light captures.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S7 Active, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.