Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has an overall score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Vivo X70 Pro is a way newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.