Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has an overall score of 85, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite body is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has much worse brightness and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels amount per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.