Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a general score of 77.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a somewhat thinner but just a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 4 less cpu cores and lesser RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Galaxy S7 Active count with similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a way bigger screen, a much brighter screen and a little bit higher 2080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.