Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-11-23 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has an overall score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's design is noticeably newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same brightness, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy S7 Active and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro feature really similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.