Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a general score of 94.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. IPhone 14 Pro Max is a notably heavier device than the Galaxy S7, but both of them have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a little bit better screen than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. IPhone 14 Pro Max features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM, a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with faster video frame rate and a much more MP back camera.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.