Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a 79.5 score against 77.4. Despite being the best in this comparison, Galaxy S7's construction is older, thicker and a little bit heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S7 features a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per display inch.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy S7 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S7 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.