Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having a global score of 81.9 against 78.3. Even being the best phone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's design is older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker than vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. Vivo X70 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much better resolution camera, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.