Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting an 81.7 score against 78.3. The Galaxy S8 is a lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.