Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), with an 83.3 score against 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a much smaller display. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S9 has a much better processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 55% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy S9 captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a camera with a way lower resolution and a worse (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.