Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-03-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Galaxy S9 is an a bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than LG G7 Fit. The Galaxy S9 features a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy S9 also has a higher number of cores.
LG G7 Fit counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bit larger display. Galaxy S9 has a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
The LG G7 Fit has a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S9 and the LG G7 Fit have similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.