Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy S9's 83.3 general score. LG K92 is a somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy S9, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit better processor than LG K92, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG K92 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S9. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG K92, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S9, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.