Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 overall score. The Galaxy S9 design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is somewhat lighter. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Galaxy S9 both count with quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a much bigger sensor and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S9 has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.