Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S9's global score of 83.3. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S9's, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S9 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better video definition.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.