Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-03-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy S9 design is somewhat heavier and notably thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S9 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S9 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S9 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S9 also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.