Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-03-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Vision, even though it was released a bit more further than a year before. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Motorola One Vision has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola One Vision captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola One Vision features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.