Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-03-16 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a global score of 83.3 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design is lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola One Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Zoom. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a brighter display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Motorola One Zoom captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much bigger sensor and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola One Zoom counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.