Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 83.1. Even though Galaxy S9 is way older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's body is just a little thinner and incredibly lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.