Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22's score of 76.1. Galaxy S9's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A22, but it's somewhat lighter. Galaxy S9 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A22. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel amount per display inch and a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy A22 has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S9 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.