Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 83.3 against 79.4. Galaxy S9's construction is lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a little thicker and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy S9 has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.