Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S9's 83.3 global score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat heavier device than the Galaxy S9, but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy S9 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S9 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.