Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than Galaxy A73 5G, getting an 83.3 score against 80.5. Galaxy S9 is a a bit thicker but just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy A73 5G. The Galaxy S9 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.