Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-04-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S9 is notably older and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, it's body is still a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a better looking display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy S9 counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy M53 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy M53 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations and a way tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.