Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and Ceramic |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's global score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy S9 body is much lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it's just a little thicker and was released 3 years before. Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S9 features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.