Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 79.5. The Galaxy S9 design is a little bit thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it was released many years before. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.