Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.7 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Tizen 4.0 | Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4, 2.2 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2011-01-05 |
| 1.57 x 1.57 x 0.43 inches | 4.64 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches |
| 1.31 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Stainless steel: Black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 430.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 4 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 275 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.83 | 7.65 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 6 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 247mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1930mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 264 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time |
| 1.12 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola ATRIX 4G is a little bit better than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), having a 57.9 score against 52.7. The Motorola ATRIX 4G design has the same thickness than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), but it is way heavier. The Motorola ATRIX 4G works with Android 2.3.6 OS, and Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) comes with Tizen 4.0 OS.
The Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) has a slightly better looking display than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a much lower 360 x 360 pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better pixel count per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola ATRIX 4G, and although they both have 2 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola ATRIX 4G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 32 GB and 16 GB internal storage. Motorola ATRIX 4G has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 1930mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola ATRIX 4G has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm).
The Motorola ATRIX 4G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.