Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.7 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Tizen 4.0 | Android 4.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2012-07-26 |
| 1.57 x 1.57 x 0.43 inches | 4.98 x 2.60 x 0.54 inches |
| 1.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Stainless steel: Black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 430.00 | $ 330.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | -- |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 247mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 220 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time |
| 1.12 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE is a bit better than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), getting a global score of 57.9 against 52.7. Despite being the best we compare here, the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE is a older, much thicker and notably heavier cellphone than the Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm). The Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE has Android 4.1 OS, while Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) counts with Tizen 4.0 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) has a slightly better display than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 360 x 360px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, although it has no external memory card slot.
Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 2 cpu cores. The Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm). The Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE has a much better battery life than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 1785mAh of battery capacity against 247mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.