Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Tizen 4.0 | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-08-29 |
| 1.57 x 1.57 x 0.43 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 1.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Stainless steel: Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 430.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 247mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm)'s general score of 52.7. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older and extremely heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), but Xiaomi managed to build it thinner anyway.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because although it has a little lower pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a really larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2246 resolution. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 6,5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm). The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 252 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.