Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than Galaxy Xcover 4S, having a overall score of 82 against 73.8. Even though the iPhone XR and Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only a couple of months difference, iPhone XR's body is somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier than Galaxy Xcover 4S. The Apple iPhone XR features a quite superior performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XR features a sharper display than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a higher 828 x 1792px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone XR has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 5% larger battery size. The Apple iPhone XR has a superior camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.