Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Galaxy Xcover 4S, getting an 80.7 score against 73.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is thinner than Galaxy Xcover 4S, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released around 9 months before. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a bigger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a lot greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. Google Pixel 3 XL shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy Xcover 4S has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.