Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with a overall score of 82.9 against 73.8. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4 XL body is thinner but also somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a bigger screen, a much better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a much better count of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Xcover 4S counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.