Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with an 82.5 score against 73.8. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10, offering lots of additional features and optimized performance. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, but LG was able to build it notably thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ has a sharper screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a larger display, a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way higher pixel count per display inch. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ has a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a lot higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The LG V30S ThinQ features superior battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.