Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S's global score of 73.8. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should count with very similar OS features. LG V40 ThinQ's design is way thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, even though it was released about 9 months before.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a way better display than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a much greater pixel density. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.