Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, having a overall score of 83.7 against 73.8. Although LG V50 ThinQ and the Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only 2 months difference, the LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a little bit heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Galaxy Xcover 4S. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a larger display, a much greater screen pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.