Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy Xcover 4S's overall score of 73.8. The LG Velvet design is newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy Xcover 4S's, but it is just a bit heavier. The LG Velvet features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a much better display than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a higher pixels quantity per display inch, a much bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG Velvet features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 54 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.