Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with an 89.6 score against 73.8. The Motorola edge body is newer and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's, but it's also a bit heavier. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Motorola edge features a little better processing power than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola edge features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a better count of pixels per inch of screen, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really bigger screen. Motorola edge captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Motorola edge features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage. Motorola edge has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.