Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50s and the Galaxy Xcover 4S were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is a little lighter and noticeably thinner. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide all the same operating system features.
Galaxy A50s features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50s counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a larger display and a better screen pixels density.
Galaxy A50s counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.