Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 and the Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10 is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040, a way better display density and a larger display. The Galaxy S10 features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a much less MP back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.