Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 overall score. Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also just a little lighter and extremely thinner than Galaxy Xcover 4S. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a larger display, a greater pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Galaxy S22 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.