Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-05-25 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is much better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, getting an 83.6 score against 73.8. Both devices in this review have the same Android 10 OS. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite design is newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a better display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Xcover 4S has a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much higher video quality. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 4160mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.