Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a score of 82.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's score of 73.8. Even though Xiaomi Mi 9T and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only a couple months difference, Xiaomi Mi 9T's construction is a bit thinner but also a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a brighter screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a larger display and a better pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little bit better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.