Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S's global score of 73.8. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction is just a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a greater display density and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a faster processing unit than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.